Market specialists have shown considerable caution regarding bullish claims that American oil giants will rapidly invest tens of billions of dollars to fix the country's broken oil infrastructure.
The Need for Absolute Protections
Without an absolute assurance of financial backing from the US federal government, specialists predict multinational oil companies to proceed with extreme caution.
“It is too early to comment on any upcoming plans,” a representative stated this weekend.
The ambitious timeline of under a year and a half has been boldly proposed. Yet, realistic assessments paint a longer timeline.
A Probable Timeline
“It’s probably going to take 36 months for any meaningful recovery in production,” noted one chief investment officer.
He suggested energy firms would likely spend:
- The first year: Sorting through new government and security contracts.
- Following phase: Beginning reconstruction of equipment.
- The third year: Starting to boost production.
The result could be an boost of around half a million barrels per day perhaps by the end of the decade.
Interest vs. Appetite for Spending
Analysts draw a critical difference between firms' attention and their willingness to spend significantly.
“I think their attention is an high score, on a range of ten. But their appetite is a mid-range score, because there is a lack of certainty yet.”
Veteran diplomats in the country reinforce this view. The thinking is that companies will publicly talk up the opportunity while privately moving with deliberate slowness.
The Enormous Cost
The required outlay would be colossal. University estimates suggest that adding between half a million and a million barrels per day would require in excess of $10 billion in funding over several years.
Yet, returning production to peak levels of around 2.5 million barrels per day could require a monumental $80 billion to $90 billion over six or seven years.
The Unanswered Question of Government Backing
The prospect of firms being compensated by the federal government has been often raised. Nevertheless, concrete details on any guarantee have not yet been forthcoming.
This lack of certainty is the primary factor behind the industry's caution. Firms seek guarantees against nationalization and the chance that a subsequent government could renege on any deal.
“You need to be shielded from sovereign risk, that we’ve seen in Venezuela previously.”
Therefore, while political optimism runs high, the financial risks suggest a road of slow deliberation for potential large-scale financial commitment in the Venezuelan oil sector.